Arix

You've used virustotal to check the file. Out of the 60+ scanners used there, one "unknown" AV raised the red flag with a type that just says the application downloads and executes things. I'm going to assume that's a false positive. You could download their jar instead if you don't trust the .exe. It all seems fine.

The warning is a warning and should not affect anything yet. Are there any exceptions when running the sources?

Maybe you should share your tips with @Mister Slyther

Interesting. I heard Cinema4D is perfect for this kind of stuff.

You'll have more luck asking this in our Discord server: https://discord.gg/FqJrAen

If I remember correctly it has to do with the packed xtea stuff. I think you have to remove (just move the file somewhere else) the packed xteas file so it gets either recreated or the raw files get used. Or something along those lines.

A base that was further built upon this release can be found here: https://www.rune-server.ee/runescape-development/rs-503-client-server/downloads/588819-interventionx-718-742-release.html Download links still intact.

Let's go on there and marry

I usually go on https://www.udemy.com/ to get courses for things. They regularly do discounts to $10 per course no matter which one.

DON'T put pokemon in RS!

Yes. The syntax is very textual, there aren't many symbols. It's like talking to a stupid person when you write Visual Basic. But if your goal is to learn another language, then maybe you should just learn that language. If your goal is to understand concepts of programming, then Visual Basic is a good start for OOP, but it definitely does not paint the whole picture.

I know they have A LOT of players and last time it was discussed the votes were appropriate for the player count. When the hype for Ikov dies out, it'll return back to normal. Due to our latest improvements to the anti-cheating systems, it's much harder to gain an effective amount of cheated votes. It's still technically possible, but it's made ineffective unless really done at MASSIVE scale. Which in turn would be noticed by our random sweeps and mitigated. I think it's fair to say that the numbers currently on our toplist are representative. I'm unaware of anyone currently being able to effectively bypass our anti-cheating. When @Ikiliki returns from vacation, perhaps he can give more insights.

Please fully recompile your source. I recommend you use an IDE in case you are not.

I wouldn't count on it, but who knows

I've dreamt of one day hosting my own self-made RSPS but I would be sure that it wouldn't get any traction due to what I want to make not being aligned with other people's interests. Now I don't really plan on doing that anymore. Maybe release one instead. Who knows.