Jump to content

Stacx

Member
  • Content count

    1,587
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Stacx

  1. vets assemble

    1. Emily

      Emily

      Hello Stacx 

  2. [quote name='Euphoria742']Do you have a clue about rsps development or java in general? And pretty sure No1 would download stuff u post[/QUOTE] The subject goes beyond development, the scan obviously points towards an old vulnerability ([url]https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-1723[/url]). Who are you to question anything anyway?
  3. this is actually devastating.
  4. [quote name='Hollywood Undead']Okay your source and client seem to have too many errors. I recommend going to java.com and reviewing what Java is and how it works before doing anything. It's a good start of learning what variables, booleans and voids are. It's what got me to be a good coder. Then, start with a new deob source instead of a released server as those errors you could be having could possibly have anti-leech attached which means a code that starts issues. Also be sure sort the methods, booleans, and voids to their home spot within the codes: make it neat as possible! Good luck[/QUOTE] He has two errors on his client. Are you blind or just unable to comprehend the output? You're trying to be nice, I respect that, but you have absolutely zero clue of what you are talking about here. Try changing these: [code]addSprite(hoverId2, hoverSpriteId, hoverSpriteId, hoverSpriteNam e, 0, 0);[/code] to [code]addSprite(hoverId2, hoverSpriteId, hoverSpriteName);[/code] Tje addSprite method takes these as parameters: [code]int, int, String[/code] You're trying to give it [code]int, int, int, String, int, int[/code]
  5. Stacx

    A really dumb question

    [quote name='iHK47']Yes, of course. Make sure the IP is 0.0.0.0 or 127.0.0.1 I'm not sure if the fields still let you put in localhost but I doubt it. If I remember correctly when I switched the IP in my client it was an integer data type. You don't need to worry about firewalls, port forwarding, etc... when playing offline. Just compile and run; rinse and repeat.[/QUOTE] 127.0.0.1 is not an integer, that is a string. 60 on the other hand is an integer. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integer[/url]
  6. [quote name='ZarosShadow']So you can only get certain game files from the cache (graphical models etc) but not the code?[/QUOTE] Exactly. The client is obtained from Jagex which contains the cache, however the cache does not contain the server code.
  7. No. Such server does not exist. Why? Because it requires you to completely re-program every single feature runescape has.
  8. [quote name='Emily']I was just curious, using pre-made gaming libraries has its limits and isn't really as much of a challenge, there are tons of open-source games for slick2d. I was just curious of the level of quality you were putting into this, which if you are using your own engine, hats off. Good luck![/QUOTE] Oh, you're right about that. Knowing OpenGL is something every game programmer needs to know and slick (as far as I remember, correct me if I'm wrong) does not support raw OpenGL calls. While libgdx does this, lwjgl would still be the optimal choice if it was for the pure purpose of learning. edit: Found a good quote about this: [quote] You should learn LWJGL before LibGDX. This is because LWJGL is just a binding to the OpenGL API in Java, whereas LibGDX is much higher level, and abstracts away a lot of the nitty-grittiness of OpenGL/LWJGL. However, in terms of actually doing dev work I think LibGDX is more efficient. This is because it exposes the parts of OpenGL that need to be exposed while also remaining much more convenient to use than LWJGL. I really think you should take the time to learn OpenGL. I know it's very complex and also very difficult to learn outside of a structured environment, but OpenGL and DirectX are both something that every game dev needs to have working knowledge of, if not comprehensive knowledge. You cannot be a first-rate game developer without knowing OpenGL, simple as that. The knowledge is absolutely integral. edit: You might want to look into Slick2D, I've been hearing a bit about it recently so it must have some things going for it.[/quote] ps. Thank you!
  9. [quote name='omg your 2 swag']woah 499$ is too much :S[/QUOTE] Hope gave you the answer in his first post in this thread. Short & sweet: There is no such thing. The reason your server is being exploited is because the server is poorly programmed, most of these exploits are public knowledge and if you don't [B]fix[/B] them, people will exploit them. Simple as that.
  10. [quote name='Emily']Are you using slick2d for this lol?[/QUOTE] No. edit: what was the point behind this post?
  11. If you take the operation, I hope everything will go well... I wish you the best of luck, stay strong.
  12. much love such skill wow
  13. [quote name='zizema660']your looking for a private server called soul split, its unfortunately as close to runescape as it gets, as for 314, 474 etc that is the revision, revision is based upon its updates so 317 is a classic revision very easy to code and as it goes up its progressively close to the new runescape[/QUOTE] No, it's not.
  14. [quote name='RealismPk']I'm sorry but are retarded? The vast majority of those wars started via capitalism and RELIGION. The seven years war? LOL Spanish, French & British colonists. French & Spanish very hardcore Catholics & British very hardcore Protestants so that is irrelevant. World Wars II i'm sorry but that started mainly from Hitlers belief that Jewish and other multi-colored skin races were a sin to pure Germans. All of these wars are Based on Religion So please think before typing...[/QUOTE] Read the last quote I had there before accusing me of anything. This section is called the "Intelligent Debate", calling one retarded because you cannot comprehend the difference between race and religion is extremely low. [quote]World Wars II i'm sorry but that started mainly from Hitlers belief that Jewish and other multi-colored skin races were a sin to pure Germans[/quote] No, this had nothing to do with religion but ethnicity and race. It had nothing to do with "being a sin to pure Germans". Please read about nationalism, the ideology was called national socialism and it had nothing to do with religion. And being the ignorant little teen you are, you cannot back your claims any further and instead end up with arguments like this one: [quote]All of these wars are Based on Religion[/quote] There is irony present in your post as well. You're telling me I'm retarded when you are unable to differentiate race and religion. WWII did not start solely because of Germany's hunt for lesser races. I'm sorry if your education has failed you this bad. What does capitalism have to do with religion? Let's get started then! I don't even have to give you background on WWII. It's your issue if your education system has failed. War of Jenkins' Ear [quote]At the conclusion of the War of the Spanish Succession, the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713 gave Britain a thirty-year asiento, or contract-right, to supply an unlimited number of slaves to the Spanish colonies, and 500 tons of goods per year. This provided British traders and smugglers potential inroads into the (traditionally) closed markets in Spanish America. But Britain and Spain were often at war during this period, fighting one another in the War of the Quadruple Alliance (1718–20), the Blockade of Porto Bello (1726) and the Anglo-Spanish War (1727–1729). In the Treaty of Seville (1729), following the Anglo-Spanish War, Britain had accorded Spanish warships the right to stop British traders and verify if the asiento right was respected. Over time the Spanish became suspicious that British traders were abusing the contract and began to board ships and confiscate their cargoes.[7] After very strained relations between 1727 and 1732, the situation improved between 1732 and 1737, when Sir Robert Walpole supported Spain during the War of Polish Succession. But the causes of the problems remained and when the opposition against Walpole grew, so did the anti-Spanish sentiment amongst the British public.[8] Walpole gave in to the pressure and approved the sending of troops to the West Indies and a squadron to Gibraltar under Admiral Haddock, causing an immediate Spanish reaction. Spain asked for financial compensation, which led to the British demand to annul the "Visitation Right" agreed to in the Treaty of Seville (1729). In reaction, King Philip V of Spain annulled the "Asiento Right" and had all British ships in Spanish harbours confiscated. The Convention of Pardo, an attempt to mediate the dispute, broke down. On 14 August, Britain recalled its ambassador to Spain and officially declared war on 23 October 1739. Despite the Pacte de Famille, France remained neutral. Walpole was deeply reluctant to declare war and reportedly remarked of the jubilation in Britain "they are ringing their bells, soon they will be wringing their hands".[9][/quote] Nothing to do with religion. Next. Austro-Prussian War [quote]For centuries, Central Europe was split into a few large states and hundreds of tiny entities, each maintaining its independence with the assistance of outside powers, particularly France. Austria, the personal territory of the Habsburg Emperors, was traditionally considered the leader of the German states, but Prussia was becoming increasingly powerful and by the late 18th century was ranked as one of the great powers of Europe. The Holy Roman Empire was formally disbanded in 1806 when the political makeup of Central Europe was re-organised by Napoleon.[4] The German states were drawn into the ambit of the Confederation of the Rhine (Rheinbund) which was forced to submit to French influence until the defeat of the French Emperor.[5] After the Napoleonic Wars ended in 1815, the German states were once again reorganized into a loose confederation: the German Confederation, under Austrian leadership. Battle of Königgrätz between Prussian and Austrian soldiers (1866) In the meantime, partly in reaction to the triumphant French nationalism of Napoleon I, and partly as an organic feeling of commonality glorified during the romantic era, German nationalism became a potent force during this period. The ultimate aim of most German nationalists was the gathering of all Germans under one state. Two different ideas of national unification eventually came to the fore. One was a "Greater Germany" (Großdeutsche Lösung) that would include all German-speaking lands, including and dominated by the multi-national empire of Austria; the other (preferred by Prussia) was a "Lesser Germany" (Kleindeutsche Lösung) that would exclude Austria and other southern German states (e.g. Luxembourg and Liechtenstein) but to be dominated by Prussia. The pretext for precipitating the conflict was found in the dispute between Prussia and Austria over the administration of Schleswig-Holstein. When Austria brought the dispute before the German diet and also decided to convene the Holstein diet, Prussia, declaring that the Gastein Convention had thereby been nullified, invaded Holstein. When the German diet responded by voting for a partial mobilization against Prussia, Bismarck declared that the German Confederation was ended. Crown Prince Frederick "was the only member of the Prussian Crown Council to uphold the rights of the Duke of Augustenberg and oppose the idea of a war with Austria which he described as fratricide." Although he supported unification and the restoration of the medieval empire, "Fritz could not accept that war was the right way to unite Germany."[6][/quote] Nothing to do with religion. Next. Franco-Prussian War [quote]The causes of the Franco–Prussian War are deeply rooted in the events surrounding the German unification. In the aftermath of the Austro–Prussian War (1866), Prussia had annexed numerous territories and formed the North German Confederation. This new power destabilized the European balance of power established by the Congress of Vienna in 1815 after the Napoleonic Wars. Napoleon III, then the emperor of France, demanded compensations in Belgium and on the left bank of the Rhine to secure France's strategic position, which the Prussian chancellor, Otto von Bismarck, flatly refused.[1]:40 Prussia then turned its attention towards the south of Germany, where it sought to incorporate the southern German kingdoms, Bavaria, Wurttemberg, Baden and Hesse-Darmstadt, into a unified Prussia-dominated Germany. France was strongly opposed to the annexation of the southern German states, which would have significantly strengthened the Prussian military.[1]:45 In Prussia, a war against France was deemed both inevitable and necessary to arouse German nationalism in those states that would allow the unification of a great German empire. This aim was epitomized by Prussian Chancellor Otto von Bismarck's quote: "I knew that a Franco–Prussian War must take place before a united Germany was formed."[7] Bismarck also knew that France should be regarded as the aggressor in the conflict to bring the southern German states to side with Prussia, hence giving Germans numerical superiority.[8] Many Germans also viewed the French as the traditional destabilizer of Europe, and sought to weaken France to prevent further breaches of the peace.[1]:41 However, the immediate cause of the war resided in the candidacy of a Prussian prince to the throne of Spain. France feared encirclement by an alliance between Prussia and Spain. The Hohenzollern prince's candidacy was withdrawn under French diplomatic pressure, but Otto von Bismarck goaded the French into declaring war by altering a telegram sent by William I. Releasing the Ems Telegram to the public, Bismarck made it sound as if the king had treated the French envoy in a demeaning fashion. Six days later, France declared war on Prussia and the southern German states immediately sided with Prussia.[8] According to some historians, such as Geoffrey Wawro, in addition to the diplomatic insult, Napoleon III and his Prime Minister, Émile Ollivier were also motivated to declare war in an attempt to solve internal political problems.[2]:28–30 However, many French historians such as Philippe Seguin dispute this. Seguin noted that Bismarck was determined to have a war, that Napoleon III was perfectly aware of the weakness of the French Army, had no wish at all to enter the war, and was only pressured by the French press and public opinion.[9][/quote] Nothing to do with religion. Next. Actually, I'm tired of c+ping background for you. Check the rest for yourself. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Soviet_War[/url] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleonic_Wars[/url] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_conquests[/url] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Japanese_War[/url] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish%E2%80%93American_War[/url] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War[/url] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falklands_War[/url] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_War[/url] Regarding Seven Years' War: [quote]This war is often said to be a continuation of the War of the Austrian Succession[6] which had lasted from 1740 to 1748, in which King Frederick II of Prussia, known as Frederick the Great, had seized the rich province of Silesia from Austria. Empress Maria Theresa of Austria had signed the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle in 1748 in order to gain time to rebuild her military forces and to forge new alliances, which she did with remarkable success. The political map of Europe had been redrawn in a few years as Austria abandoned its twenty-five-year alliance with Britain. During the so‑called Diplomatic Revolution of 1756, the centuries-old enemies: France, Austria and Russia, formed a single alliance against Prussia. All the participants of the Seven Years' War. Great Britain, Prussia, Portugal, with allies France, Spain, Austria, Russia, Sweden with allies Prussia's only major assistance came from Great Britain, her newfound ally, whose reigning dynasty saw its ancestral Hanoverian possessions in Germany being threatened by France. In many respects the two allied powers' forces complemented each other excellently. The British had the largest, most effective navy in the world, while Prussia had the most formidable land force in continental Europe. This allowed Britain to focus its military resources on colonial expeditions. The British had hoped that the new series of alliances formed during the Diplomatic Revolution would maintain the peace, but, in fact, they proved the catalyst for the eruption of hostilities in Europe in 1756. The Austrian army had undergone an overhaul along the lines of the Prussian system. Maria Theresa, whose knowledge of military affairs might have shamed many of her generals, had pressed relentlessly for reform.[7] Her interest in the welfare of the soldiers had gained her their unqualified respect. Austria had suffered several humiliating defeats to Prussia in the previous war, and, strongly dissatisfied with the limited help she had received from the British, now saw France as the only ally who could help her retake Silesia and check Prussia's expansion.[8] A further cause for war arose from the heated colonial struggle between the British Empire and French Empire which, as they both expanded, met and clashed with one another on two continents. The formal opening of hostilities in Europe was preceded by fighting in North America, where the westward expansion of the British colonies located along the eastern seaboard began to run afoul of French claims to the Mississippi valley in the late 1740s and early 1750s. In order to forestall the expansion of Virginia and Pennsylvania, in particular, the French built a line of forts in what is now western Pennsylvania in the mid-1750s. British efforts to dislodge them led to conflicts generally considered to be part of the French and Indian War, in which fighting began two years before the onset of hostilities in Europe.[9][/quote] [B]If the participants of a war represent a certain religious group, that does not make the war a religious war. Whatever ignites the conflict that leads to war is the cause.[/B] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hundred_Years'_War[/url] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kongo_Civil_War[/url] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosovo_War[/url] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_War[/url] Once you're mature enough to back up your arguments, come back!
  15. [quote name='RealismPk']You say not really while please list me some wars which did not or contain a form of religion within? Religion is the cause of most wars beside the cold wars which were affected with religion as well.[/QUOTE] You make absolutely no sense, but okay. World War II, The War of Jenkin's Ear, World War I, The Austro-Prussian War, the Franco-Prussian War, The Soviet-Polish War, the Napoleonic Wars, The Mongol invasion, The Russo-Japanese War, the Spanish-American War, Both Gulf Wars, the Falklands War, the Iran-Iraq War, the Seven Years' War, the Hundred Years' War, the Congolese Civil War, the Kosovo War, the Winter War... need I go on? [quote]Each of these had a complex set of causes and motivations, but none were solely or even primarily about religion. Of course, religious fears and prejudices were exploited in propaganda in many cases, but that doesn't mean it underlied the conflict.[/quote]
  16. [quote name='Slik']You're right in suggesting there are alternative views, but you have to understand that they are simple that, views. If you look back when people couldn't coherently speak with other people, it was religion that acted as an education institution. People would listen to holy books and build on their vocabulary, people could become a priest and learn to learn and write.[/QUOTE] Regarding Christianity on this matter... [url]http://www.badnewsaboutchristianity.com/gde_education.htm[/url]
  17. [quote name='RealismPk']Mostly every war is over religion...[/QUOTE] Not really... [quote]All religions also broke of from the religion " Judaism " [/quote] * Abrahamic religions branch off Judaism. When Christianity expanded to North Europe, it had to adapt some Germanic traditions such as Christmas (Yule, it's still used in most Germanic languages except English, in Norwegian = Jule, Swedish = Jul, Finnish (not Germanic) = Joulu, but yet in English it's still had a weird transition to 'Christmas'). The native religion of the Germanic tribes was slowly transitioned to the poisonous Christianity that had spread across Europe and this transition did not happen naturally, but by foul play and brute force. They stripped down some Jewish elements and replaced those with Christianized versions of native traditions and festivals in order to convert people. So it basically ended up with some native traditions and 100% Jewish deities. That's why. [url]http://thuleanperspective.com/2013/07/24/about-christianity/[/url] [url]http://thuleanperspective.com/2013/07/29/the-fruits-of-judeo-christianity/[/url] sources @ [url]http://www.badnewsaboutchristianity.com/gi0_vandalism.htm[/url] (bottom)
  18. Stacx

    RuneLocus Den

    I have no idea what I just read but I like it!
  19. Cinematics were dull, the CC is pretty bad and it really doesn't have much effects. That's my input.
  20. [quote name='Gripper'][MENTION=152696]Citellum[/MENTION], I make my own tutorials thank you very much and my Grand Exchange is 100% with no bugs.[/QUOTE] No, it's not lol.
  21. Stacx

    Quick Help (Advice)

    ITT: OP is looking for: [quote]a idiot who wastes his time going threw 562 Sources and Clients and seeing if it is "Good" or "Bad"[/quote]
×